Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Next class
Yes we are having class next week. One problem I will cover in more detail is the motives for horizontal and vertical integration. Here is a thought problem to work through in the meantime. Let's say you own a set of apartment buildings. You can either call a plumber each time a problem arises, or have a plumber on permanent payroll (let's assume you have enough buildings so that this is a feasible option).
Under what conditions should you call a plumber each time and under what conditions should you put a plumber on payroll?
That's a problem with a plumber. You can make progress by switching the job description, and the associated capital goods, and then see what happens to your answer.
Under what conditions should you call a plumber each time and under what conditions should you put a plumber on payroll?
That's a problem with a plumber. You can make progress by switching the job description, and the associated capital goods, and then see what happens to your answer.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Why frontage?
Right now I'm in Texas and they have a highway system involving "frontage" roads; google to it if you don't already know the concept. Under what assumptions does a frontage system make sense?
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Review Session
Please comment with questions or concepts for Thursday 11/19's 8pm review session, same room we have class. We'll go over the topics you all post on here first (with preference given to multiple requests for the same concept, so don't be afraid to repeat each other) and then open for additional questions if time permits.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Comcast and NBC
This is vague and doesn't offer much economics, but if you're curious on the background of the pending deal, here is one article. I would in any case stress that I try to make such questions independent of your knowledge of particular details.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Up-and-out schemes
As you probably know, a lot of law firms have "up-and-out" schemes. If you don't make partner by a certain number of years, you don't just hang around at a lower level of compensation. They expect you to leave and if need be they'll fire you.
Why is this? Is it just the factor of morale? Can you think of other possible explanations?
This is a good example of what I would consider to be a good exam question.
Why is this? Is it just the factor of morale? Can you think of other possible explanations?
This is a good example of what I would consider to be a good exam question.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Possible answers to the service charge problem
You'll find a few (of many) here, read the comments section too.
Monday, November 9, 2009
Super-simple questions
Let's say you want to get something fixed, say a car. One company will give you a free estimate of what the repair will cost. Another company charges for the estimate, meaning that you pay for the estimate whether or not you end up using their service.
Under what conditions should you go with the first company? The second company?
Like I said, a super-simple problem, like most of economics!
Under what conditions should you go with the first company? The second company?
Like I said, a super-simple problem, like most of economics!
Friday, November 6, 2009
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Monday, November 2, 2009
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)